Starknet Floats Leaving Ethereum's Layer 2 Tier to Run Its Own Chain
The network said it is weighing a move from Ethereum rollup to standalone layer 1, pitching quantum resistance by 2027. Its token rose about 20 percent on the news, Decrypt reported.
Starknet, an Ethereum layer 2 built on zero-knowledge proof technology, is actively considering converting itself into its own base-layer blockchain, Decrypt reported. The network framed the change around quantum resistance, saying the move would make it the first fully quantum-resistant chain by 2027. Its token rose roughly 20 percent after the disclosure.
A layer 2 is a separate execution environment that posts its data and proofs back to Ethereum and inherits Ethereum's settlement guarantees. A layer 1 settles itself. The difference is not cosmetic: it determines who secures the chain, where its fees go, and what a user is trusting when they hold an asset on it.
What changes if it happens
The economics are the plain part. A rollup pays Ethereum to publish data and verify proofs, and that cost sits between gross fee revenue and whatever the network keeps. A standalone chain stops paying that bill and instead has to pay for its own security, typically through token issuance to validators. One cost line is replaced by another, and which one is cheaper depends on usage.
The security argument is the harder part. Assets on a rollup are, in the limit, Ethereum assets with an Ethereum-verified claim. Assets on an independent chain are secured by that chain's own validator set and its own token. For anything with a real-world claim attached, such as tokenised funds or collateral, that distinction is the one legal and risk teams ask about first.
The quantum framing
Quantum resistance refers to cryptography designed to survive attack by a sufficiently capable quantum computer, which would in principle break the elliptic-curve signatures that most blockchains use to authorise transactions. No such machine is known to exist at the required scale. Treating the threat as a design constraint is a defensible engineering choice; treating a 2027 date as a delivered capability is not, and the claim is Starknet's own.
Why the direction of travel is notable
The standard story of the last three years has run the other way: chains launching as layer 2s to borrow Ethereum's security and liquidity rather than bootstrapping their own. Two Ethereum layer 2s announced closures within a single week earlier this year. A network of Starknet's size publicly considering the exit is a different kind of signal about how the economics of the rollup tier are being read from the inside.
Nothing is settled. Starknet described the move as under consideration, and a conversion of that type requires governance approval, a validator set and a migration path for assets and bridges that currently point at Ethereum.
What to watch is whether a formal governance proposal appears with a dated migration plan, and how bridged assets and stablecoin issuers on Starknet are treated in it.
We report facts in our own words and link to the reporting we drew them from. We do not reproduce a source's prose, headline or images. Nothing here is investment advice.